TR 08 FAS 168 over OTTAUQUECHEE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+43.64564, -72.4188543°38'44" N, 72°25'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TR 08 FAS 168 over OTTAUQUECHEE RIVER |
Structure number: | 200168000614082 |
Location: | 0.1 MI N JCT. U.S.4 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 85.0 ft. [25.9 m] |
Total length: | 86.9 ft. [26.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 2012 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,400 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2400 | 82.3 |
June 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2400 | 82.3 |
June 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2400 | 65.0 |
January 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2400 | 61.0 |
April 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 2140 | 55.9 |
May 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2140 | 56.9 |
September 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 2140 | 49.1 |
June 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2140 | 62.4 |
September 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2140 | 62.4 |
September 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 2140 | 52.3 |
August 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 2140 | 48.8 |
September 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2140 | 60.3 |
July 1994 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 1970 | 36.3 |
August 1992 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 1970 | 36.3 |
November 1990 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 1560 | 38.6 |