SR 31 over PEND OREILLE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+48.86519, -117.3732348°51'55" N, 117°22'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 31 over PEND OREILLE RIVER |
Structure number: | 0003749A0000000 |
Location: | 14.3 N JCT SR 20 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 240.2 ft. [73.2 m] |
Total length: | 695.9 ft. [212.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.8 ft. [10.3 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Deck [09] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,192 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 49.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $9,466,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1192 | 49.5 |
August 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1156 | 49.3 |
August 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1156 | 49.3 |
August 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1456 | 48.2 |
September 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1492 | 57.2 |
September 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 1492 | 48.0 |
September 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 1300 | 48.7 |
July 2004 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 1300 | 45.3 |
May 2003 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 1300 | 45.3 |
July 2001 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 1300 | 45.3 |
May 1999 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 1500 | 55.8 |
August 1997 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 1568 | 70.4 |
August 1995 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 1568 | 70.4 |
August 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1240 | 74.3 |
May 1990 | Poor | Serious | Good | Satisfactory | 1240 | 69.0 |