Share: 
US 101 over BEAR RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.34856, -123.95803
46°20'55" N, 123°57'29" W
+46.34856, -123.95803
46°20'55" N, 123°57'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | US 101 over BEAR RIVER |
| Structure number: | 0005195A0000000 |
| Location: | 5.2 N JCT SR 103 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
| Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Total length: | 212.0 ft. [64.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.8 ft. [9.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 22° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1956 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,952 [as of 2016] |
| Truck traffic: | 16% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 71.1 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $3,392,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1952 | 71.1 |
| May 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1644 | 72.1 |
| May 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1644 | 72.1 |
| May 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1707 | 71.8 |
| May 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1837 | 71.3 |
| May 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1832 | 71.3 |
| June 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1717 | 71.8 |
| June 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1717 | 71.8 |
| June 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1717 | 72.8 |
| August 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1700 | 72.9 |
| June 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1700 | 70.9 |
| December 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1700 | 71.8 |
| November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1700 | 66.0 |
| March 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1295 | 66.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1589359
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1589359