SR 401 over NASELLE RIVER OVERFLOW
Map
Coordinates:
+46.36942, -123.8080246°22'10" N, 123°48'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 401 over NASELLE RIVER OVERFLOW |
Structure number: | 0007360A0000000 |
Location: | 11.6 N JCT US 101 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 200.1 ft. [61.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 8 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,933 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 75.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $3,200,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 2933 | 75.0 |
August 2016 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 2731 | 76.2 |
November 2014 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 2731 | 76.2 |
November 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2977 | 78.1 |
November 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2995 | 78.1 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2995 | 78.1 |
October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2669 | 80.8 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2669 | 80.8 |
September 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2669 | 80.8 |
August 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2669 | 81.8 |
June 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2669 | 81.8 |
December 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 120019 | 66.0 |
November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2669 | 81.8 |
March 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1390 | 83.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 5,600 | 5,422 | 173 | 5 | 0 |
Substructure |
Prestressed Concrete Column | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 72 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 34 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 259 | 258 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 |
Open Joint | linear ft. | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 400 | 400 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 5,600 | 5,598 | 0 | 2 | 0 |