SR 240 over GEO. WASHINGTON WAY
Map
Coordinates:
+46.26047, -119.2643946°15'38" N, 119°15'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 240 over GEO. WASHINGTON WAY |
Structure number: | 0012558D0000000 |
Location: | 4.0 E JCT SR 224 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
Length of largest span: | 168.0 ft. [51.2 m] |
Total length: | 248.0 ft. [75.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1984 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 13,181 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,778,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 13181 | 99.0 |
March 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13181 | 100.0 |
March 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13127 | 100.0 |
March 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13127 | 100.0 |
March 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9482 | 98.7 |
April 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10098 | 98.6 |
June 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10098 | 98.6 |
April 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10098 | 98.6 |
October 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9900 | 98.6 |
September 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 9900 | 96.6 |
July 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 9900 | 96.6 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9900 | 96.5 |
July 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 14600 | 90.7 |
June 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 14600 | 86.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 248 | 248 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 6,448 | 6,446 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 58 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 52 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 52 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Enclosed/Concealed Bearing | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 496 | 496 | 0 | 0 | 0 |