SR 4 over RANGILA SLOUGH
Map
Coordinates:
+46.33167, -123.6950046°19'54" N, 123°41'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 4 over RANGILA SLOUGH |
Structure number: | 0013358B0000000 |
Location: | 2.3 E PACIFIC CO |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 194.9 ft. [59.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,888 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 80.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,964,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1888 | 80.9 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1793 | 80.0 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2215 | 79.0 |
May 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2195 | 78.0 |
June 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1697 | 80.0 |
November 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1697 | 80.0 |
September 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1697 | 80.0 |
June 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1697 | 80.0 |
June 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1821 | 80.0 |
December 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1821 | 80.0 |
November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1821 | 80.0 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1750 | 80.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,170 | 1,170 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 7,020 | 7,019 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 88 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 144 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 390 | 390 | 0 | 0 | 0 |