SMITH HOLLOW RD. over SMITH HOLLOW
Map
Coordinates:
+46.47087, -118.0268446°28'15" N, 118°01'37" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SMITH HOLLOW RD. over SMITH HOLLOW |
Structure number: | 079932000000000 |
Location: | 3.2 S JCT SR261 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 34° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1979 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
October 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
April 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
April 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
April 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
August 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
June 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
April 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
March 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
February 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
April 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
April 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 96.8 |
March 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 78.0 |