SO VALLEY ROAD over SO FORK NASELLE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.36461, -123.8097846°21'53" N, 123°48'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SO VALLEY ROAD over SO FORK NASELLE RIVER |
Structure number: | 080718000000000 |
Location: | 1.0 S JCT 4 & 401 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
Total length: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 352 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 352 | 65.2 |
June 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 352 | 65.2 |
June 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 352 | 65.1 |
June 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 352 | 65.1 |
June 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 352 | 65.1 |
July 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 352 | 76.4 |
August 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 352 | 76.4 |
November 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 352 | 76.4 |
October 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 352 | 76.4 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 352 | 76.4 |
December 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 352 | 76.4 |
April 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 74.4 |
February 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 77.4 |
February 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 77.4 |
April 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 77.4 |
March 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 76.4 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 76.4 |
May 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 76.4 |
May 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 255 | 76.4 |
April 1992 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 255 | 62.4 |