Share: 
COUNTY HIGHWAY over POTHOLES EAST CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+46.49074, -119.19293
46°29'27" N, 119°11'35" W
+46.49074, -119.19293
46°29'27" N, 119°11'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over POTHOLES EAST CANAL |
| Structure number: | 083813000000000 |
| Location: | 0.11 E JCT 903 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
| Total length: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1954 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1973 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 725 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,338,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 725 | 78.1 |
| December 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 725 | 78.1 |
| December 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 725 | 77.9 |
| December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 648 | 77.9 |
| January 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1173 | 75.4 |
| March 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1173 | 75.4 |
| January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 496 | 78.0 |
| December 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 496 | 78.0 |
| February 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 496 | 78.0 |
| January 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 477 | 78.0 |
| January 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 477 | 78.0 |
| January 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 477 | 78.0 |
| February 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 265 | 56.0 |
| January 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 265 | 89.4 |
| March 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 375 | 89.3 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1594281
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1594281