GOODWIN ROAD over WENATCHEE R. BNRR RT.285
Map
Coordinates:
+47.52794, -120.4895047°31'41" N, 120°29'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | GOODWIN ROAD over WENATCHEE R. BNRR RT.285 |
Structure number: | 084309000000000 |
Location: | 01.0W CASHMERE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 124.0 ft. [37.8 m] |
Total length: | 503.0 ft. [153.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Deck [09] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,193 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 18.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $25,000,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2193 | 18.7 |
May 2017 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2193 | 25.4 |
June 2016 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2193 | 25.1 |
June 2015 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2156 | 25.2 |
June 2014 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2156 | 25.2 |
June 2012 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 2238 | 25.1 |
June 2011 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 2550 | 24.8 |
September 2010 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 2550 | 24.8 |
September 2009 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 2550 | 24.8 |
August 2007 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 160 | 33.2 |
December 2006 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 160 | 33.2 |
September 2005 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 160 | 33.2 |
November 2004 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 160 | 43.3 |
September 2002 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 600 | 32.9 |
November 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 32.9 |
September 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 32.9 |
August 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 32.9 |
June 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 42.3 |
August 1993 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 42.3 |
April 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 42.3 |