USH 8 over SOMO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.55330, -90.0470145°33'12" N, 90°02'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | USH 8 over SOMO CREEK |
Structure number: | B50003700000000 |
Location: | 2.8M E JCT CTH D TO S |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1981 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,100 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2100 | 88.4 |
November 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2500 | 86.4 |
September 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2500 | 86.4 |
September 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2500 | 85.4 |
September 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2873 | 83.6 |
September 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2873 | 83.6 |
September 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2873 | 83.6 |
September 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2873 | 83.6 |
September 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2873 | 83.6 |
September 2000 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 2200 | 86.8 |
June 1998 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 2200 | 84.8 |
November 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2200 | 84.8 |
July 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2200 | 84.8 |
September 1995 | - | N out of 10 | 2200 | 84.9 |
October 1994 | - | N out of 10 | 2200 | 84.9 |
September 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1890 | 86.5 |
November 1992 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1890 | 86.5 |
November 1991 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1890 | 86.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 144 | 48 | 93 | 3 | 0 |