Share: 
LRD PENTOGA RD over BRULE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.00189, -88.50086
46°00'07" N, 88°30'03" W
+46.00189, -88.50086
46°00'07" N, 88°30'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | LRD PENTOGA RD over BRULE RIVER |
| Structure number: | P19001300000000 |
| Location: | 8.0M N JCT STH 70 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Total length: | 61.0 ft. [18.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 22 [as of 2015] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 47.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $266,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 22 | 47.1 |
| September 2017 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 22 | 47.1 |
| September 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 22 | 47.1 |
| September 2015 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 22 | 47.1 |
| September 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 22 | 47.1 |
| September 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 22 | 44.1 |
| September 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 21 | 50.0 |
| September 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 21 | 50.0 |
| September 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 21 | 50.0 |
| September 2004 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 21 | 50.0 |
| August 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 21 | 50.0 |
| October 2000 | Poor | Very Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 20 | 37.0 |
| October 1998 | Poor | Very Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 20 | 44.5 |
| October 1996 | Poor | Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 20 | 46.5 |
| September 1994 | Poor | Fair | Poor | - | 20 | 45.1 |
| September 1992 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Very Good | 20 | 45.1 |
| August 1990 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 20 | 41.1 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1608297
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1608297