LRD WHITNALL PARK over WHITNALL PARK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.93505, -88.0454042°56'06" N, 88°02'43" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LRD WHITNALL PARK over WHITNALL PARK CREEK |
Structure number: | P40056400000000 |
Location: | 0.2M E JCT USH 45 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 49.5 ft. [15.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1933 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 192 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 192 | 90.5 |
September 2016 | Fair | - | - | - | 9987 | 59.6 |
September 2014 | Fair | - | - | - | 8500 | 56.8 |
September 2012 | Fair | - | - | - | 8500 | 56.8 |
September 2010 | Fair | - | - | - | 8500 | 56.8 |
September 2008 | Fair | - | - | - | 8500 | 56.8 |
March 2007 | Fair | - | - | - | 8500 | 67.9 |
September 2004 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 8500 | 42.3 |
August 2002 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 8500 | 56.8 |
November 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 69.3 |
November 1998 | Fair | - | - | - | 8500 | 67.3 |
December 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 69.3 |
October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 8500 | 69.6 |
December 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 8500 | 69.6 |
October 1990 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 8500 | 69.6 |