US Route 22 over OHIO RIVER & OHIO RT 7
Map
Coordinates:
+40.37779, -80.6102540°22'40" N, 80°36'37" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US Route 22 over OHIO RIVER & OHIO RT 7 |
Structure number: | 00000000005A060 |
Location: | At Ohio State Line |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
Length of largest span: | 819.9 ft. [249.9 m] |
Total length: | 1964.7 ft. [598.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 91.9 ft. [28.0 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 68.9 ft. [21.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main span design: | Stayed girder [14] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 33,960 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 68.6 |
Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,797,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 33960 | 68.6 |
October 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 31494 | 69.0 |
October 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 31494 | 69.0 |
October 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30000 | 81.1 |
October 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30000 | 81.1 |
October 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 30000 | 81.1 |
October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 30000 | 81.0 |
October 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 30000 | 69.2 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 30000 | 69.2 |
October 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 30000 | 69.2 |
October 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 30000 | 51.4 |
October 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 30000 | 51.4 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 32500 | 80.6 |
October 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 32500 | 80.6 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 26500 | 81.5 |
October 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 83.1 |
November 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 81.4 |
December 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 81.4 |
December 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 16500 | 81.4 |
December 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 12000 | 82.1 |
December 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 12000 | 87.0 |
January 1995 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 23500 | 85.1 |
July 1993 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 23500 | 85.1 |
July 1992 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 21000 | 85.5 |
June 1990 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good | 21000 | 86.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 9,463 | 7,967 | 1,488 | 8 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 137,269 | 119,414 | 16,481 | 0 | 1,374 |
Steel Stringer | linear ft. | 14,080 | 12,657 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 94,911 | 82,571 | 11,390 | 0 | 950 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 180,152 | 173,811 | 4,073 | 2,268 | 0 |
Superstructure |
Steel Main Cable | linear ft. | 21,340 | 21,159 | 170 | 11 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 43,246 | 29,596 | 12,884 | 262 | 504 |
Steel Floor Beam | linear ft. | 6,390 | 6,247 | 141 | 2 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 119,166 | 103,674 | 14,300 | 0 | 1,192 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 245 | 31 | 168 | 46 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 186 | 144 | 34 | 8 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 358 | 166 | 141 | 51 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 92 | 0 | 92 | 0 | 0 |
Assembly without Seal Joint | linear ft. | 184 | 92 | 92 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 38 | 10 | 24 | 4 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 380 | 307 | 63 | 10 | 0 |
Movable Bearing | each | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 240 | 210 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 14 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 220 | 170 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 6,299 | 4,288 | 1,694 | 317 | 0 |