COUNTY ROUTE 20/17 over LITTLE SEWELL CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+37.95615, -80.75003
37°57'22" N, 80°45'00" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	COUNTY ROUTE 20/17 over LITTLE SEWELL CREEK
Structure number:	00000000013A064
Location:	0.22 Miles S. of CR 60/32
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	28.2 ft. `[8.6 m]`
Total length:	31.5 ft. `[9.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	13.8 ft. `[4.2 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	14.1 ft. `[4.3 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1952
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Girder and floorbeam system `[03]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	110 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	10% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. `[4]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	32.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$387,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2018	Poor	Fair	Poor	Poor	110	32.0
May 2016	Poor	Fair	Poor	Poor	110	45.8
May 2014	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.8
May 2013	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	53.8
June 2012	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	53.8
April 2011	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	52.0
May 2010	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	50.9
April 2009	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	53.2
April 2008	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	53.2
April 2007	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	53.2
April 2006	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	53.2
April 2005	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	49.9
April 2004	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	49.9
April 2003	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	54.0
April 2002	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Satisfactory	100	54.0
April 2001	Poor	Excellent	Poor	Satisfactory	100	51.0
April 2000	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	100	47.0
April 1998	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	100	49.0
April 1996	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	100	79.0
May 1994	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Critical	100	22.0
May 1992	Poor	Good	Fair	Poor	100	51.0
May 1990	Poor	Good	Fair	Poor	100	51.0