COUNTY ROUTE 60/29 over MEADOW RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+37.99394, -80.74786
37°59'38" N, 80°44'52" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	COUNTY ROUTE 60/29 over MEADOW RIVER
Structure number:	00000000013A134
Location:	0.01 Miles E. of US 60
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	30.2 ft. `[9.2 m]`
Total length:	90.6 ft. `[27.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	12.1 ft. `[3.7 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	12.1 ft. `[3.7 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1954
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main span design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	101 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	10% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Superior to present desirable criteria `[9]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	36.8
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$958,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
September 2018	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	101	36.8
September 2016	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	110	36.8
June 2014	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	100	23.0
June 2013	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	100	23.0
June 2012	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	100	23.0
June 2011	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2010	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2008	Poor	Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2006	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2005	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2004	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2003	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2002	Poor	Very Good	Poor	Fair	100	53.0
June 2001	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	100	66.0
June 2000	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	100	66.0
June 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	100	68.0
June 1996	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	100	76.0
May 1994	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	100	68.0
May 1992	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	100	76.0
June 1990	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	100	67.0