I-64 RAMP C WBL over WADES CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.80025, -80.2808337°48'01" N, 80°16'51" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-64 RAMP C WBL over WADES CREEK |
Structure number: | 00000000013A170 |
Location: | 0.01 Miles E. of US 60 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Total length: | 59.4 ft. [18.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,702 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 28% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 54.4 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $701,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 8702 | 54.4 |
August 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 8702 | 54.4 |
August 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 781 | 78.4 |
August 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 800 | 78.4 |
August 2010 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Good | 5500 | 78.2 |
September 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1500 | 78.1 |
September 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1000 | 78.5 |
August 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1500 | 78.1 |
September 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1500 | 96.1 |
September 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1500 | 96.1 |
September 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1500 | 78.1 |
September 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1000 | 77.5 |
October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2900 | 73.7 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1700 | 76.6 |
October 1990 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 6800 | 68.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 61 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 180 | 167 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 83 | 81 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 180 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 118 | 112 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 118 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,230 | 2,035 | 0 | 195 | 0 |