Share: 
COUNTY ROUTE 36/6 over JERICHO DRAFT
Map
Coordinates:
+37.83037, -80.27919
37°49'49" N, 80°16'45" W
+37.83037, -80.27919
37°49'49" N, 80°16'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY ROUTE 36/6 over JERICHO DRAFT |
| Structure number: | 00000000013A246 |
| Location: | 0.02 Miles E. of CR 36/1 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Total length: | 54.1 ft. [16.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 2006 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Other [9] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2016] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 96.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 96.0 |
| May 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 96.0 |
| May 2010 | Good | - | - | Excellent | 11000 | 96.0 |
| May 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 96.0 |
| May 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 96.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1612618
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1612618