CR 1/1 SLS over HOPEWELL RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+39.37107, -77.9409239°22'16" N, 77°56'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 1/1 SLS over HOPEWELL RUN |
Structure number: | 00000000019A001 |
Location: | 0.46 MI W JCT CR 03 SLS |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1972 |
Year reconstructed: | 1995 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 232 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 67.6 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $60,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 232 | 67.6 |
March 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 250 | 67.6 |
March 2013 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 250 | 72.2 |
March 2011 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 500 | 67.7 |
March 2009 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 200 | 72.1 |
March 2007 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 200 | 72.1 |
March 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 80.0 |
March 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 450 | 80.0 |
March 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 450 | 80.0 |
March 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 350 | 80.0 |
March 1997 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 250 | 84.5 |
March 1995 | Fair | Excellent | Excellent | Satisfactory | 250 | 83.8 |
August 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 250 | 32.8 |
September 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 250 | 55.7 |
October 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 250 | 61.2 |