US ROUTE 52 over TUG FORK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.41709, -81.5899937°25'02" N, 81°35'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US ROUTE 52 over TUG FORK |
Structure number: | 00000000024A129 |
Location: | 0.03 MI W OF WV 103 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Total length: | 85.6 ft. [26.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 72.2 ft. [22.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1957 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,122 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 4122 | 77.7 |
October 2016 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 8868 | 70.0 |
October 2014 | Good | - | Good | Good | 8000 | 83.7 |
October 2012 | Good | - | Good | Good | 6400 | 86.2 |
October 2010 | Good | - | Good | Good | 6400 | 86.2 |
October 2008 | Good | - | Good | Good | 7800 | 84.0 |
October 2006 | Good | - | Good | Good | 8100 | 83.6 |
October 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 8100 | 83.6 |
October 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 8000 | 83.7 |
October 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 8000 | 81.7 |
October 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8000 | 81.7 |
October 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8000 | 81.7 |
October 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8000 | 81.7 |
October 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8000 | 81.7 |
October 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9300 | 81.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 5,400 | 5,400 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,200 | 3,793 | 0 | 407 | 0 |
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 300 | 229 | 55 | 16 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 144 | 136 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 150 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 16 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 |