Share:

COUNTY ROUTE 27/8 over SIXTEENMILE CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+38.68715, -82.10746
38°41'14" N, 82°06'27" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COUNTY ROUTE 27/8 over SIXTEENMILE CREEK
Structure number:00000000027A040
Location:0.01 MI N OF CR 54/2
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Total length:52.2 ft. [15.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:46.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$450,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
November 2017FairFairGoodFair1046.2
November 2015FairSatisfactoryGoodFair1047.2
December 2013FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1073.5
November 2012FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1063.4
December 2011FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1078.1
July 2010FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1077.9
August 2009FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1077.9
August 2008FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1077.9
July 2007FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1077.9
July 2006FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1079.8
July 2005PoorSatisfactoryGoodPoor1050.9
July 2003FairSatisfactoryGoodFair1065.5
July 2001FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1076.5
August 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodGood1076.5
November 1997FairSatisfactoryGoodGood1076.5
November 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodGood1076.5
November 1993FairSatisfactoryGoodGood5075.5
February 1992FairSatisfactoryGoodGood5075.5
March 1990GoodGoodGoodVery Good5075.5