COUNTY ROUTE 2/10 over OHIO RIVER BACK CHANNEL
Map
Coordinates:
+39.39100, -81.2085839°23'28" N, 81°12'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROUTE 2/10 over OHIO RIVER BACK CHANNEL |
Structure number: | 00000000037A027 |
Location: | 0.17 MILE WEST OF WV 2 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 213.6 ft. [65.1 m] |
Total length: | 457.4 ft. [139.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 18.7 ft. [5.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 16.7 ft. [5.1 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1928 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Closed Grating [4] |
Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 37.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,300,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 50 | 37.0 |
July 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 50 | 35.0 |
October 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 50 | 39.0 |
September 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 50 | 48.6 |
October 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 10 | 43.0 |
July 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 10 | 43.0 |
October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 10 | 43.0 |
October 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 10 | 43.0 |
October 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 550 | 26.0 |
September 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 550 | 26.0 |
September 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 500 | 26.0 |
September 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 30 | 43.0 |
September 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 30 | 37.0 |
August 1993 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 30 | 37.0 |
August 1991 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 30 | 37.0 |