COUNTY ROUTE 10 over EIGHTEEN MILE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.62608, -81.9480338°37'34" N, 81°56'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROUTE 10 over EIGHTEEN MILE CREEK |
Structure number: | 00000000040A008 |
Location: | 0.66 MI E OF CR 12 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 58.1 ft. [17.7 m] |
Total length: | 119.4 ft. [36.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1953 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 450 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 55.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $700,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 450 | 55.3 |
July 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 450 | 73.4 |
September 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 450 | 73.4 |
August 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 400 | 70.8 |
July 2011 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 400 | 72.8 |
July 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 460 | 71.6 |
July 2009 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 460 | 71.6 |
August 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 460 | 71.6 |
August 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 500 | 71.6 |
September 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 500 | 71.6 |
September 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 550 | 70.5 |
December 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 700 | 70.4 |
December 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 700 | 70.4 |
December 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 700 | 70.4 |
January 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 71.5 |
February 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 70.3 |
July 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 600 | 70.3 |
August 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 650 | 70.2 |