COUNTY ROUTE 37 over LONG BRANCH OF TRACE FK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.34142, -81.9785838°20'29" N, 81°58'43" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROUTE 37 over LONG BRANCH OF TRACE FK |
Structure number: | 00000000040A095 |
Location: | 0.10 MI S OF CR 39 SLS |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1977 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 411 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 66.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $150,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 411 | 66.0 |
March 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 350 | 66.0 |
March 2014 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 70 | 54.0 |
March 2012 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 70 | 54.0 |
March 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 400 | 66.0 |
March 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 400 | 66.0 |
March 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 400 | 66.0 |
April 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 400 | 66.0 |
May 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 350 | 66.0 |
June 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 350 | 66.0 |
July 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 350 | 66.0 |
July 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 350 | 66.0 |
September 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 450 | 68.5 |
September 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 350 | 78.3 |
October 1990 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 350 | 78.3 |