CR 50 over CHARLEY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.39450, -82.0290038°23'40" N, 82°01'44" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 50 over CHARLEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 00000000040A105 |
Location: | 0.05 MI N OF CR 50/5 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1976 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Other [00] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 449 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 449 | 81.8 |
January 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 400 | 81.8 |
January 2014 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 400 | 81.8 |
February 2012 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 400 | 81.8 |
February 2010 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 81.8 |
February 2008 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 81.8 |
April 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 81.8 |
April 2004 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 400 | 81.8 |
May 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 400 | 81.8 |
July 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 250 | 81.8 |
July 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 50 | 85.8 |
August 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 50 | 85.8 |
September 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.5 |
November 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 50 | 75.5 |
November 1990 | Fair | Excellent | Excellent | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.5 |