Share:

County Route 10 over Left Fork Buffalo Run

Map

Coordinates:
+39.50291, -80.98749
39°30'10" N, 80°59'15" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:County Route 10 over Left Fork Buffalo Run
Structure number:00000000048A016
Location:0.09 mi. North jct CR10/4
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:213 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:72.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$337,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2018FairFairFairFair21372.2
February 2016FairFairFairFair10080.9
February 2014FairFairFairFair10080.9
February 2012FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10091.9
February 2010FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10095.9
March 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10096.9
February 2008FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10095.9
March 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10096.9
March 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10096.9
March 2000FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10096.9
March 1998FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10096.9
March 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10096.9
March 1994FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10096.9
March 1992FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10089.4
March 1990FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood10089.4