County Route 10 over Pursley Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+39.53606, -80.9564039°32'10" N, 80°57'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | County Route 10 over Pursley Creek |
Structure number: | 00000000048A080 |
Location: | 0.07 mi. South jct WV18 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
Total length: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.4 ft. [5.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1999 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 198 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 80.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $220,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 198 | 80.9 |
July 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 300 | 80.8 |
July 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 300 | 80.8 |
July 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 200 | 80.9 |
August 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 200 | 80.9 |
August 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 200 | 80.9 |
August 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 200 | 80.9 |
August 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 200 | 80.9 |
August 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 250 | 80.8 |
August 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 250 | 80.8 |