COUNTY ROUTE 1/13 over PECKS RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+39.05963, -80.1549139°03'35" N, 80°09'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROUTE 1/13 over PECKS RUN |
Structure number: | 00000000049A008 |
Location: | 0.45 MI. S. OF CO 1 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Total length: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1915 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2015] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 64.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $25,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2018 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 90 | 64.3 |
July 2016 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 88 | 73.5 |
July 2014 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 80 | 49.9 |
July 2012 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Good | 80 | 59.9 |
July 2010 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 59.7 |
July 2008 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 59.7 |
July 2006 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 59.7 |
August 2004 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Good | 80 | 61.7 |
August 2002 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Good | 80 | 61.7 |
June 2000 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 80 | 49.9 |
May 1998 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 80 | 48.2 |
May 1996 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 80 | 48.2 |
May 1994 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 80 | 48.2 |
May 1992 | Good | - | Good | Good | 80 | 54.3 |
May 1990 | Good | - | Good | Good | 80 | 54.3 |