Share: 
County Road 19 over Deer Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+42.77037, -105.97242
42°46'13" N, 105°58'21" W
+42.77037, -105.97242
42°46'13" N, 105°58'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | County Road 19 over Deer Creek |
| Structure number: | EEZ |
| Location: | 7 Miles S.W. Of Glenrock |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Total length: | 104.0 ft. [31.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1981 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 37 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 41.0 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $80,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 37 | 41.0 |
| September 2017 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 37 | 41.0 |
| August 2016 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 37 | 41.0 |
| August 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 120 | 33.8 |
| August 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 120 | 55.9 |
| August 2011 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 120 | 55.9 |
| October 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 120 | 55.9 |
| August 2007 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 120 | 55.9 |
| September 2005 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 70 | 63.0 |
| October 2003 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 70 | 63.0 |
| September 2001 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 70 | 63.0 |
| September 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 70 | 85.0 |
| April 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 70 | 85.0 |
| September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 70 | 85.0 |
| September 1993 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 70 | 85.0 |
| December 1991 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 70 | 85.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1620406
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1620406